Amazon Holiday Deals

Tuesday, March 1, 2011

Junk food and our kids

Here is one short article on the impact of junk foods to our kids - truth be told!
-----

Posted: 08 February 2011

Students purchase snacks at a vending machine in a school.
PARIS - Toddlers who have a diet high in processed foods may have a slightly lower IQ in later life, according to a British study described as the biggest research of its kind.

The conclusion, published on Monday, comes from a long-term investigation into 14,000 people born in western England in 1991 and 1992 whose health and well-being were monitored at the ages of three, four, seven and eight and a half.

Parents of the children were asked to fill out questionnaires that, among other things, detailed the kind of food and drink their children consumed.

Three dietary patterns emerged: one was high in processed fats and sugar; then there was a "traditional" diet high in meat and vegetables; and finally a "health-conscious" diet with lots of salad, fruit and vegetables, pasta and
rice.

When the children were eight and a half, their IQ was measured using a standard tool called the Wechsler Intelligence Scale.

Of the 4,000 children for which there were complete data, there was a significant difference in IQ among those who had had the "processed" as opposed to the "health-conscious" diets in early childhood.

The 20 per cent of children who ate the most processed food had an average IQ of 101 points, compared with 106 for the 20 per cent of children who ate the most "health-conscious" food.

"It's a very small difference, it's not a vast difference," said one of the authors, Pauline Emmett of the School of Social and Community Medicine at the University of Bristol.

"But it does make them less able to cope with education, less able to cope with some of the things in life."

The association between IQ and nutrition is a strongly debated issue because it can be skewed by many factors, including economic and social background.

A middle-class family, for instance, may arguably be more keen (or more financially able) to put a healthier meal on the table, or be pushier about stimulating their child, compared to a poorer household.

Emmett said the team took special care to filter out such confounders.

"We have controlled for maternal education, for maternal social class, age, whether they live in council housing, life events, anything going wrong, the home environment, with books and use of television and things like that," she said.

The size of the study, too, was unprecedented.

"It's a huge sample, it's much much bigger than anything anyone else has done," she said in an interview with AFP.

Emmett said further work was needed to see whether this apparent impact on IQ persisted as the children got older.

Asked why junk food had such an effect, she suggested a diet that was preponderantly processed could lack vital vitamins and elements for cerebral development at a key stage in early childhood.

"A junk food diet is not conducive to good brain development," she said.

The paper appears in the peer-reviewed Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, published by the British Medical Association (BMA).

- AFP/rl


Taken from ChannelNewsAsia.com; source article is below:
Junk food diet linked to lower IQ



Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, January 24, 2011

Starting To Pick Up

Part of a parterre in an English garden. Photo...Image via WikipediaLast Saturday, around evening time, I went out with my third child to buy food for our dinner – my wife usually takes some time off on weekends – and she gets it without a fight.

For the past weeks, I’ve been doing some gardening, and without a piece of land to settle the plants in, we make do with pots. That is our life here: our abode is hanging in the air, suspended between levels and levels of flats above and below. Did I excite you momentarily? I was just saying that living in a foreign land and not having finances in excess will not allow you to enjoy the same benefits, or privileges, than when you are at your birth place. Yes, I am a foreigner in my present land of abode. I may convert into a citizen, but that doesn’t change my skin.

My daughters are usually coming out to see what I’m doing whenever I do my planting things. One time they were so curious as to see if other than plants, there are living creatures. And  they did. Millipedes. Earthworms. Ants. My third child was quite shaky getting near, but still, curious to see how an earthworm is in real life. The one I had in one of the pots was very small and short, and is almost invisible to the unobserving eye. You have to stare and search for it. And it seems it was a loner.

Anyway, the other 2 girls saw it, and they were discussing it. She didn’t, and she keeps on asking if I’ve touched it someway, somehow, etc., etc. So what I did is to look for the teeny-weeny earthworm, scooped it up with some soul, and then showed it once more to them. The crawler crawled a bit, then it landed on my palm where there is no soil, and she was like, “What? Didn’t bite you?” And I just showed to her that it is harmless. She’d grown up in a place where there isn’t anything much to offer when it comes to being dirty and soiled with naked earth. It is all concrete and asphalts, and the trees and plants are taken care of by paid workers. And if you don’t do these things at home in a miniature level, there’ll be no other place or other chance that your children will come face-to-face with such down-to-earth experiences, and their existence on this earth will have a missing part – that’s sad.

Now, I've been doing this planting and repotting chore for a number of times, and at times, one of them would come out alone, and would have a chance to do hands-on. Another time, it will be the other one. So to say, they are having their chance, each one of them.

I should say that their interest is gaining momentum.

Now, as said at the beginning, we went out, me and my third daughter, to buy food at the food hawker center for our dinner. Since there are some other items to buy, we went over to the variety store afterwards. Aside from grocery items and the usual prime commodities for sale, they have a limited collection of plants in small pots, along with a limited set of plastic pots, pot stands, garden soil, and some other gardening accessories. Whenever I pass by that shop, I’d take a look, at times, very short, at times, longer, scrutinizing what they have. They sell it cheap compared to the other shops nearby or within the larger vicinity. So that shop is a no-brainer choice – if they have what you are looking for, it’s a steal!

My daughter went with me when I went over to the stall where the plants are. She looked and checked, looked closer, left and right, then picked one small plant. She knows what we already have at home, and although those plants belong to the whole family, the decision on things like what gets thrown away (when the time comes to clear up) or what stays, what’s repotted, what’s pruned, etc., still rests on me and my wife, the father and the mother. So knowing that, she picked a plant of her liking, and said, “Can I buy my own plant?”

I was glad that she showed the interest, and I would be more than glad to guide her in her newfound passion, but I said, “Mama will scold you if you use your money and buy that plant.”

“But how come you can buy plants and she don’t get angry?”

I ignored that question, and continued to look at other plants, all the while trying and attempting to find some answers to throw back.

Since she didn’t insist on having an answer, I delayed a few more seconds, then I finally said, “That doesn’t look very nice. Let’s come back and see if there comes a better one next time.”

And with that we left. She didn’t complain, knowing that she can have her own plant, when the right time comes.

I mentioned this to my wife, to which she explained, that she had agreed with our kids, that whatever they save from their daily allowances, they can buy whatever they like.

So perhaps, to be true to my word, and to let my child be happy, we’ll come back next time to see what would be on sale.

Then we can do our gardening together.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, December 13, 2010

Finger's tell-tale on men's prostate cancer

Would you believe it now? This is quite a breakthrough - why your index finger can tell you a lot about your getting prostate cancer.

How about that?
-----

Finger length predicts prostate cancer risk

PARIS - Men whose index fingers are longer than their ring, or fourth, fingers run a significantly lower risk of prostate cancer, according to a study published Wednesday in the British Journal of Cancer.

The chances of developing the disease drop by a third, and even more in younger men, the study found.

"Our results show that relative finger length could be used as a simple test for prostate cancer risk, particularly in men aged under 60," said Ros Eeles, a professor at the Institute of Cancer Research in Britain and co-author of the study.

Finger pattern could help identify which men should undergo regular screening, especially in combination with genetic testing or other risk factors such as a family history of the disease, she said.

From 1994 to 2009, Eeles and colleagues questioned more than 1,500 prostate cancer patients in Britain, along with 3,000 healthy control cases.

For more than half the men, the index was shorter than the ring finger. Compared to this group, men whose index and ring fingers were the same length -- 19 per cent of the cohort -- had a similar prostate cancer risk.

But when the index finger was longer, the risk of developing the disease dropped by 33 per cent.

Men under 60 were 87 per cent less likely to be in the cancer group.

The relative length of the two fingers in question -- set before birth -- appears to be a marker of different levels of sex hormones to which a baby is exposed in the womb, with less testosterone correlating with a longer index finger.

Earlier research has shown that testosterone promotes the growth of prostate cancer.

Underlying the unexpected connection between digits and cancer are two genes, HOXA and HOXD, that control both finger length and the development of sex organs.

Other studies have found a link between exposure to hormones before birth and the development of other diseases, including breast cancer and osteoarthritis.

- AFP/rl


Taken from ChannelNewsAsia.com; source article is below:
Finger length predicts prostate cancer risk


Enhanced by Zemanta